Functional locations and assets
Create or import equipment, areas, conveyors, screens, crushers, trucks, pumps, motors and plant components.
Planned maintenance and compliance control
See where planned work, inspections and breakdowns may be leaking money.
Estimate the cost of late planned orders, missing actual work evidence, unresolved inspection findings, repeat breakdowns, escalation delays and plant downtime. Then start with one practical maintenance-control process around your real assets and functional locations.
Start with Excel and PDFsCreate your own functional locationsAssign artisans and audit compliance
Starting pointOne maintenance review
Data needed firstPlanned Excel + actual PDFs
Initial scopeOne plant, site or work centre
Software approachConfigured around your PM process
What the configurable platform can control
Connect planned orders, actual work evidence, inspections, assets, artisans and escalation in one practical view.
PlantMaint360 is a working, configurable maintenance-control platform. Each client implementation is shaped around the organisation’s actual plant structure, approved data sources, upload rules, artisans, supervisors, planners, responsibilities and audit requirements.
Planned Excel and actual PDF uploads
Upload planned orders from Excel and actual completed order PDFs, then compare planned versus actual evidence.
Artisan assignments
Assign artisans to planned orders, inspections or corrective actions and track completion, notes and responsibility.
Online inspections
Perform inspections by functional location, capture photos, record findings and create follow-up maintenance actions.
Compliance dashboards
Measure compliance by site, asset, work centre, artisan, order type, planner, month or overdue status.
Escalation and audit trail
Escalate overdue orders, missing evidence and failed inspection findings with audit history and management visibility.
Maintenance discovery questions
Can your team answer these maintenance-control questions without hours of manual follow-up?
A “no”, “not easily” or “only after checking several systems” points to a practical control gap worth reviewing. These questions are informed by years of application development and workflow experience in mining and industrial maintenance environments.
Practical discovery—not a generic software pitch.Use the questions below to identify one real process where better ownership, evidence and visibility could make a measurable difference.
Can you see which planned orders still have no verified actual work evidence?
The answer should be available by site, work centre, asset, planner, artisan and reporting period—not only after reconciling spreadsheets and PDFs.
Can you quantify the cost and operational effect of downtime and repeat breakdowns?
A useful view connects breakdown history, lost hours, recurring equipment problems, responsible teams, parts and follow-up actions.
Do inspection findings automatically become owned maintenance actions?
Each finding should have a responsible person, priority, due date, evidence requirement, escalation path and closure history.
Can supervisors immediately see who owns every overdue or unverified order?
Clear responsibility reduces the gap between identifying an exception and getting the correct person to resolve it.
Can current SAP, Excel, PDF, SharePoint or email information be used without replacing everything?
A practical first implementation can begin with approved exports and documents, then add integrations only where they create measurable value.
Can management compare maintenance compliance across sites, assets and work centres in one current view?
The same information should support daily operational follow-up and higher-level trend, risk and performance reporting.
Can you reconstruct the full audit trail for an order, finding or escalation?
Users should be able to see the source record, evidence, assignments, notes, status changes, approvals and final closure.
If two or more answers depend on spreadsheets, phone calls or manual checking, one focused maintenance review can identify a measurable first workflow.
Discuss one live process
Free browser calculator
Planned maintenance leakage and compliance calculator
Use rough monthly figures. Results update as you type. The estimate helps identify which real maintenance records should be checked first during a local PM-control discovery.
Your practical first step
Start with one proven maintenance workflow, configured around the way your operation actually works.
The reusable platform is already developed. Discovery is used to configure your functional locations, approved planned and actual data, inspection forms, roles, escalation rules, reports and dashboards without forcing your team into a generic process.
Estimate the maintenance leakage
Use the calculator to identify whether downtime, compliance, evidence, inspections or escalation should be reviewed first.
Walk the current PM process
Review planned Excel files, actual PDFs, artisan allocation, asset structure, inspection sheets and overdue work.
Use existing information
Start with exports, spreadsheets, PDFs, WhatsApp notes, photos, maintenance plans and current forms.
Configure the client maintenance workflow
Configure the app around the client’s real sites, equipment, work centres, users, audits, escalations and dashboards.
Frequently asked questions
Start small, prove the value, then expand.
Do we need to replace our existing maintenance system?
No. PlantMaint360 can start as a control and visibility layer using current planned Excel files, actual order PDFs and inspection records.
Can users create their own plant structure?
Yes. The configurable platform can create or import functional locations and assets, then group them by site, area, work centre or equipment type.
Can inspection findings become work actions?
Yes. Failed inspection items can become assigned actions, escalations or maintenance orders with photos, notes, due dates and audit history.
Does the calculator guarantee savings?
No. It is an indicative discussion tool only and must be validated against real maintenance and production records.
Local South African discovery
Discuss one live maintenance process with us.
We can demonstrate the working PlantMaint360 platform, walk through one live maintenance process and identify which planned-order, actual-evidence, inspection, downtime or escalation workflow should be configured first.
This static page does not save form values. The email or WhatsApp button opens the application on your device and you decide whether to send the prepared message.